linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/18] MAINTAINERS - Remove L: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org from all but "THE REST"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 May 2009 21:58:01 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] MAINTAINERS - Remove L:
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org  from all but "THE REST"

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 22:51 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Do subsystem maintainers think so?  Unless they do (and tell others
> so), I don't think it will actually happen.  Until that point, I don't
> think the L:linux-kernel lines should be removed.

Well, if scripts/get_maintainers.pl becomes more widely used,
cc'ing lkml will become more automatic.

Anyway, removing lkml from all sections might stop
a MAINTAINERS reader from thinking lkml should not
be cc'd when not mentioned.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/