linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [9/16] HWPOISON: Use bitmask/action code for try_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 10:28:18 +0200
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [9/16] HWPOISON: Use bitmask/action code for try_to_unmap behaviour

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:03:19AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:27:03AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Not a bad idea, but I would prefer to have a set of flags which tell
> > try_to_unmap what to do, and then combine them with #defines for
> > callers. Like gfp flags.
> 
> That's exactly what the patch does?

There are a set of "actions" which is what the callers are, then a
set of modifiers. Just make it all modifiers and the callers can
use things that are | together.

 
> It just has actions and flags because the actions can be contradictory.
> 
> > And just use regular bitops rather than this TTU_ACTION macro.
> 
> TTU_ACTION does mask against multiple bits. None of the regular
> bitops do that. 

&, |  ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/