linux-kernel - Re: IFF_LOWER_UP does not fit in ifr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 May 2009 20:50:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Fredrik Arnerup" <fredrik.arnerup@...eware.tv>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IFF_LOWER_UP does not fit in ifr_flags

On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:59:05 +0200 "Fredrik Arnerup" <fredrik.arnerup@...eware.tv> wrote:

> Documentation/networking/operstates.txt (and netdevice(7)) claims that
> the flags IFF_LOWER_UP, IFF_DORMANT and IFF_ECHO can be read from user space
> using ioctl() with SIOCGIFFLAGS. Looking in include/linux/if.h however,
> the flags are returned in a struct ifreq in the field ifr_flags which
> is declared as a short, while the flags are defined as:
> 
> #define IFF_LOWER_UP    0x10000         /* driver signals L1 up         */
> #define IFF_DORMANT     0x20000         /* driver signals dormant       */
> #define IFF_ECHO        0x40000         /* echo sent packets            */
> 
> Those aren't shorts, are they? In net/core/dev.c dev_get_flags() returns
> an unsigned which is assigned to ifr_flags directly.
> 
> Looked at linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.29.y.git.
> CC me please.
> 

(cc netdev)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/