linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 31 May 2009 13:46:19 -0400
From:	Paul Smith <paul@...-scientist.net>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate

On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 17:31 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> The only source of signals during a dump should be external ones. Far
> better would be to set some kind of defined signal mask during the dump
> (say SIGPIPE, SIGINT, SIGQUIT) ? I agree with Paul's patch in the sense
> we don't want spurious SIGIO events or similar spoiling a dump.

Something similar to this is what Andi Kleen first proposed.  The issue
is that it modifies the signal mask for the process before the core was
dumped, so that the mask saved in the core was not the real mask used by
the process when it took the exception.

Andi mentioned this problem and suggested we'd need to keep the original
mask around to be saved in the core.  That would involve deeper hacking
in the ELF format but maybe this is the right answer.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/