linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: i915: ensure objects are allocated below 4GB on PAE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 31 May 2009 08:49:05 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To:	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	"airlied@...hat.com" <airlied@...hat.com>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.sf.net" <dri-devel@...ts.sf.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i915: ensure objects are allocated below 4GB on
	PAE

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:40:12AM +0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 08:42 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:18:40AM +0800, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on x86_64:
> > > > my 32-bit PAE machine with (slightly!) > 4GB shows no ZONE_DMA32.
> > > > Does this patch perhaps depend on another, to enable DMA32 on 32-bit
> > > > PAE, or am I just in a muddle?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > No, you're exactly right, I'm just a muppet and missed the obvious.
> > > Looks like the "correct" fix is the fact that the allocation is thus
> > > filled out with GFP_USER, therefore, from ZONE_NORMAL, and below
> > > max_low_pfn.
> > > 
> > > Looks like we'll need some additional thinking to get true ZONE_DMA32 on
> > > i386... ugh, I'll look into it tonight.
> > For i386, GFP_USER is enough. But 945G GART can only map to physical page < 4G,
> > so for x64, we need GFP_DMA32. This is the reason I add extra GFP_DMA32.
> 
> Those 945Gs don't have memory located above 4G, from my reading of the
> chipset specs.
ok, then GFP_DMA32 can be removed from the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/