lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:42:39 +0400
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, xemul@...allels.com,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec_path 1/9: introduce ->exec_path and switch
	/proc/*/exe

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:30:33PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:07:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > > 
> > > Doesn't this pin the vfs mount of the executable for the lifetime of
> > > the task?
> > 
> > Well, yes, but so does the current code.
> 
> Not quite. The current code pins it as long as the corresponding VMAs
> are mapped -- not for the lifetime of the task.
> 
> > Sure, in _theory_ it can be a non-mmap executable (maybe people still have 
> > those old OMAGIC a.out executables), and in _theory_ you could unmap the 
> > executable even if it was originally mmap'ed, but neither of those is 
> > exactly common, are they?
> 
> Not common to my knowledge, no.
> 
> > 
> > So in practice, nothing has changed wrt lifetime of the executable.
> 
> Almost all of the time, yes.

And year ago executable wasn't pinned at all, so if you're opposing
widening of time executable is pinned, you should revert your own patch
which introduced it in first place.

->exec_path merely makes /proc/*/exe very unheuristical (binfmt loader
decides, nothing else) and suitable for other code as demonstrated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ