linux-kernel - Re: sata_sil24 0000:04:00.0: DMA-API: device driver frees DMA sg list with different entry count [map count=13] [unmap count=10]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:33:05 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	just.for.lkml@...glemail.com
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, hancockrwd@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 0000:04:00.0: DMA-API: device driver frees DMA sg
 list 	with different entry count [map count=13] [unmap count=10]

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:12:34 +0200
Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:02 AM, FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:30:32 +0200
> > Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com> wrote:
> >> Still happens with 2.6.30-rc8 (see trace at the end of the email)
> >>
> >> As orig_n_elem is only used two times in libata-core.c I suspected a
> >> corruption of the qc->sg, but adding checks for this did not trigger.
> >> So I looked into lib/dma-debug.c.
> >> It seems add_dma_entry() does not protect against adding the same
> >> entry twice.
> >
> > Do you mean that add_dma_entry() doesn't protect against adding a new
> > entry identical to the existing entry, right?
> 
> Yes, as I read the hash bucket code in lib/dma-debug.c a second entry
> from the same device and the same address will just be added to the
> list and on unmap it will always return the first entry.

It means that two different DMA operations will be performed against
the same dma addresss on the same device at the same time. It doesn't
happen unless there is a bug in a driver, an IOMMU or somewhere, as I
wrote in the previous mail.


> > Then it's not a
> > dma-debug bug (it might be better for dma-debug to check it though),
> > that is, such situation should not happen.
> 
> At least the warning about the wrong unmap count is a bug in the
> dma-debug, as that is not what happens on my system.
> 
> > Probably, it's an IOMMU bug
> > or a driver bug.
> 
> Could it be just a forgotten unmap?
> That would leave the old entry in the dma-debug list, but from the
> driver side it would be valid to map the same place again without
> corrupting any data transfer to the harddisk.

Yeah, I thought about this possibility. However, you use GART IOMMU,
right (you can see "PCI-DMA: using GART IOMMU." in a boot message if
so)? If you use GART IOMMU, unmapped addresses are not reused.


> What also would point in this direction, sometime I have seen this in my log:
> [ 1004.061989] DMA-API: debugging out of memory - disabling

Sounds like there is a leak...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/