[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 23:58:02 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Woody Suwalski <woodys@...dros.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
eric@...olt.net, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
stable@...nel.org, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
stefan.bader@...onical.com
Subject: Re: Intel 915GM MCHBAR bug
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 09:37:00AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:14:41 +0300 Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> wrote:
>>>>> Wanna show us the patch?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because the world could certainly do with more i915 bugfixes :(
>>>> Here is Jesse's patch from
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2009-January/001186.html
>>>> adopted for 2.6.30-rc8... (needed to redo hunk #3 for
>>>> i915_gem_tile.c)
>>> Yup. I took the two patches from here:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/349314
>>>
>>> and did the same rediffing on top of 2.6.30-rc8 for the first one.
>>>
>>> Andrew, do you want me to forward you the (tested) patches or should
>>> we wait for Jesse et al to take care of it?
>>
>> Yes, please send them out.
>
> OK, I did that. I am bit unhappy that I had to do it, though. The patch
> dates back to January (!) and Ubuntu folks have been carrying it for a
> while now.
We cirtainly have been carrying for some time. My understanding was
that the maintainers had it and had been expecting it to merge through
them. Did we miss a trick somewhere?
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists