lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:39:16 +0900
From:	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] vmscan: fix may_swap handling for memcg

On Mon,  8 Jun 2009 12:20:54 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi
> 
Hi, thank you for your comment.

> > From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> > 
> > Commit 2e2e425989080cc534fc0fca154cae515f971cf5 ("vmscan,memcg: reintroduce
> > sc->may_swap) add may_swap flag and handle it at get_scan_ratio().
> > 
> > But the result of get_scan_ratio() is ignored when priority == 0, and this
> > means, when memcg hits the mem+swap limit, anon pages can be swapped
> > just in vain. Especially when memcg causes oom by mem+swap limit,
> > we can see many and many pages are swapped out.
> > 
> > Instead of not scanning anon lru completely when priority == 0, this patch adds
> > a hook to handle may_swap flag in shrink_page_list() to avoid using useless swaps,
> > and calls try_to_free_swap() if needed because it can reduce
> > both mem.usage and memsw.usage if the page(SwapCache) is unused anymore.
> > 
> > Such unused-but-managed-under-memcg SwapCache can be made in some paths,
> > for example trylock_page() failure in free_swap_cache().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> 
> I think root cause is following branch, right?
yes.

> if so, Why can't we handle this issue on shrink_zone()?
> 
Just because priority==0 means oom is about to happen and I don't
want to see oom if possible.
So I thought it would be better to reclaim as much pages(memsw.usage) as possible
in this case.

> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
>                                 struct scan_control *sc)
> {
>         get_scan_ratio(zone, sc, percent);
> 
>         for_each_evictable_lru(l) {
>                 int file = is_file_lru(l);
>                 unsigned long scan;
> 
>                 scan = zone_nr_pages(zone, sc, l);
>                 if (priority) {				// !!here!!
>                         scan >>= priority;
>                         scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
>                 }
> 
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ