lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:47:12 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	liqin.chen@...plusct.com
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] score: create Kconfig Kconfig.debug Makefile

On Tuesday 09 June 2009, liqin.chen@...plusct.com wrote:

> +++ b/arch/score/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
> +config SCORE
> +       bool
> +       default y
> +       select EMBEDDED

I don't think you should select EMBEDDED. The option is slightly
misnamed and just enables some other config options. If you need
any of those that are protected by EMBEDDED, then maybe select those
directly.

> +config NO_DMA
> +       bool
> +       default y

Are you planning to implement DMA support? We just had a lenghty
discussion about how to do it generically. While we did not find
a solution, you can probably easily take the
asm-generic/dma-mapping-linear.h I posted and adapt that to your
needs.

> +config SCORE_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
> +       int
> +       default "5"

Your arch/score/include/asm/cache.h contains

#define L1_CACHE_SHIFT         4

One of the two looks wrong ;-)

If you have different cache implementations, this value
should probably be the maximum of all CPUs that are configured
in the kernel.

> +config HZ
> +       int
> +       default 100

Have you looked into implementing NO_HZ? It is not required in any
way, but can probably reduce your power consumption, which may be
interesting for embedded systems.

> +config KEXEC
> +       bool "Kexec system call (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> +       depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> +       help

Do you actually support this? I did not look very closely,
but could not find anything about kexec in the other patches.
If not, just drop the config option.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ