| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:42:33 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: More aggressive frequency adjustment
Commit-ID: bd2b5b12849a3446abad0b25e920f86f5480b309
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/bd2b5b12849a3446abad0b25e920f86f5480b309
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:40:57 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:55:26 +0200
perf_counter: More aggressive frequency adjustment
Also employ the overflow handler to adjust the frequency, this results
in a stable frequency in about 40~50 samples, instead of that many ticks.
This also means we can start sampling at a sample period of 1 without
running head-first into the throttle.
It relies on sched_clock() to accurately measure the time difference
between the overflow NMIs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 5 +-
include/linux/perf_counter.h | 1 +
kernel/perf_counter.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index 49f2585..240ca56 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -696,10 +696,11 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
if (!attr->exclude_kernel)
hwc->config |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS;
- if (!hwc->sample_period)
+ if (!hwc->sample_period) {
hwc->sample_period = x86_pmu.max_period;
+ atomic64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
+ }
- atomic64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
counter->destroy = hw_perf_counter_destroy;
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_counter.h b/include/linux/perf_counter.h
index 3586df8..282d8cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_counter.h
@@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ struct hw_perf_counter {
u64 freq_count;
u64 freq_interrupts;
+ u64 freq_stamp;
#endif
};
diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 5eacaaf..51c571e 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -1184,13 +1184,33 @@ static void perf_counter_cpu_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx, int cpu)
static void perf_log_throttle(struct perf_counter *counter, int enable);
static void perf_log_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 period);
-static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx)
+static void perf_adjust_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 events)
+{
+ struct hw_perf_counter *hwc = &counter->hw;
+ u64 period, sample_period;
+ s64 delta;
+
+ events *= hwc->sample_period;
+ period = div64_u64(events, counter->attr.sample_freq);
+
+ delta = (s64)(period - hwc->sample_period);
+ delta = (delta + 7) / 8; /* low pass filter */
+
+ sample_period = hwc->sample_period + delta;
+
+ if (!sample_period)
+ sample_period = 1;
+
+ perf_log_period(counter, sample_period);
+
+ hwc->sample_period = sample_period;
+}
+
+static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx)
{
struct perf_counter *counter;
struct hw_perf_counter *hwc;
- u64 interrupts, sample_period;
- u64 events, period, freq;
- s64 delta;
+ u64 interrupts, freq;
spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
list_for_each_entry(counter, &ctx->counter_list, list_entry) {
@@ -1202,6 +1222,9 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx)
interrupts = hwc->interrupts;
hwc->interrupts = 0;
+ /*
+ * unthrottle counters on the tick
+ */
if (interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
perf_log_throttle(counter, 1);
counter->pmu->unthrottle(counter);
@@ -1211,6 +1234,9 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx)
if (!counter->attr.freq || !counter->attr.sample_freq)
continue;
+ /*
+ * if the specified freq < HZ then we need to skip ticks
+ */
if (counter->attr.sample_freq < HZ) {
freq = counter->attr.sample_freq;
@@ -1226,20 +1252,20 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx)
} else
freq = HZ;
- events = freq * interrupts * hwc->sample_period;
- period = div64_u64(events, counter->attr.sample_freq);
-
- delta = (s64)(1 + period - hwc->sample_period);
- delta >>= 1;
-
- sample_period = hwc->sample_period + delta;
-
- if (!sample_period)
- sample_period = 1;
+ perf_adjust_period(counter, freq * interrupts);
- perf_log_period(counter, sample_period);
-
- hwc->sample_period = sample_period;
+ /*
+ * In order to avoid being stalled by an (accidental) huge
+ * sample period, force reset the sample period if we didn't
+ * get any events in this freq period.
+ */
+ if (!interrupts) {
+ perf_disable();
+ counter->pmu->disable(counter);
+ atomic_set(&hwc->period_left, 0);
+ counter->pmu->enable(counter);
+ perf_enable();
+ }
}
spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
@@ -1279,9 +1305,9 @@ void perf_counter_task_tick(struct task_struct *curr, int cpu)
cpuctx = &per_cpu(perf_cpu_context, cpu);
ctx = curr->perf_counter_ctxp;
- perf_adjust_freq(&cpuctx->ctx);
+ perf_ctx_adjust_freq(&cpuctx->ctx);
if (ctx)
- perf_adjust_freq(ctx);
+ perf_ctx_adjust_freq(ctx);
perf_counter_cpu_sched_out(cpuctx);
if (ctx)
@@ -1647,10 +1673,10 @@ static int perf_counter_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 __user *arg)
counter->attr.sample_freq = value;
} else {
+ perf_log_period(counter, value);
+
counter->attr.sample_period = value;
counter->hw.sample_period = value;
-
- perf_log_period(counter, value);
}
unlock:
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
@@ -2853,35 +2879,41 @@ void __perf_counter_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
* event flow.
*/
+struct freq_event {
+ struct perf_event_header header;
+ u64 time;
+ u64 id;
+ u64 period;
+};
+
static void perf_log_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 period)
{
struct perf_output_handle handle;
+ struct freq_event event;
int ret;
- struct {
- struct perf_event_header header;
- u64 time;
- u64 id;
- u64 period;
- } freq_event = {
+ if (counter->hw.sample_period == period)
+ return;
+
+ if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD)
+ return;
+
+ event = (struct freq_event) {
.header = {
.type = PERF_EVENT_PERIOD,
.misc = 0,
- .size = sizeof(freq_event),
+ .size = sizeof(event),
},
.time = sched_clock(),
.id = counter->id,
.period = period,
};
- if (counter->hw.sample_period == period)
- return;
-
- ret = perf_output_begin(&handle, counter, sizeof(freq_event), 0, 0);
+ ret = perf_output_begin(&handle, counter, sizeof(event), 1, 0);
if (ret)
return;
- perf_output_put(&handle, freq_event);
+ perf_output_put(&handle, event);
perf_output_end(&handle);
}
@@ -2923,15 +2955,16 @@ int perf_counter_overflow(struct perf_counter *counter,
{
int events = atomic_read(&counter->event_limit);
int throttle = counter->pmu->unthrottle != NULL;
+ struct hw_perf_counter *hwc = &counter->hw;
int ret = 0;
if (!throttle) {
- counter->hw.interrupts++;
+ hwc->interrupts++;
} else {
- if (counter->hw.interrupts != MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
- counter->hw.interrupts++;
- if (HZ*counter->hw.interrupts > (u64)sysctl_perf_counter_limit) {
- counter->hw.interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
+ if (hwc->interrupts != MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
+ hwc->interrupts++;
+ if (HZ * hwc->interrupts > (u64)sysctl_perf_counter_limit) {
+ hwc->interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
perf_log_throttle(counter, 0);
ret = 1;
}
@@ -2945,6 +2978,16 @@ int perf_counter_overflow(struct perf_counter *counter,
}
}
+ if (counter->attr.freq) {
+ u64 now = sched_clock();
+ s64 delta = now - hwc->freq_stamp;
+
+ hwc->freq_stamp = now;
+
+ if (delta > 0 && delta < TICK_NSEC)
+ perf_adjust_period(counter, NSEC_PER_SEC / (int)delta);
+ }
+
/*
* XXX event_limit might not quite work as expected on inherited
* counters
@@ -3379,7 +3422,6 @@ static const struct pmu *tp_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
return NULL;
counter->destroy = tp_perf_counter_destroy;
- counter->hw.sample_period = counter->attr.sample_period;
return &perf_ops_generic;
}
@@ -3483,10 +3525,11 @@ perf_counter_alloc(struct perf_counter_attr *attr,
pmu = NULL;
hwc = &counter->hw;
+ hwc->sample_period = attr->sample_period;
if (attr->freq && attr->sample_freq)
- hwc->sample_period = div64_u64(TICK_NSEC, attr->sample_freq);
- else
- hwc->sample_period = attr->sample_period;
+ hwc->sample_period = 1;
+
+ atomic64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
/*
* we currently do not support PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP on inherited counters
@@ -3687,6 +3730,9 @@ inherit_counter(struct perf_counter *parent_counter,
else
child_counter->state = PERF_COUNTER_STATE_OFF;
+ if (parent_counter->attr.freq)
+ child_counter->hw.sample_period = parent_counter->hw.sample_period;
+
/*
* Link it up in the child's context:
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists