linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:19:51 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree

On 06/12/2009 05:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got conflicts in about 23
> files.  This has happened because only a subset of the kvm tree that is
> merged into the linux-next tree has been merged into Linus' tree *and*
> that subset was rebased before the merge happened.
>
> I have dropped the kvm tree.
>    

I'll merge asap.

> Is there some other branch that I should be including in linux-next
> instead of the current one i.e. something that represents what you will
> actually send to Linus that doesn't need to be rebased before that
> happens?
>    

There's always kvm-updates/2.6.n+1, but that doesn't get updates until 
the merge window gets close.


-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/