linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:28:30 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because
 there's no local APIC

> +		if (error == -EINVAL) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The ACPI tables themselves were malformed.
> +			 * Dell Precision Workstation 410, 610 come here.
> +			 */
> +			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> +			       "Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI\n");
> +			disable_acpi();
> +		} else {

This seems a very bad model. On todays systems turning off ACPI renders
them basically useless. If the MADT is bogus its far better to pray that
they rest of the ACPI is mostly sound and continue by ignoring the only
dodgy table.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/