linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31] block: add request clone interface (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:02:49 +0300
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
CC:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31] block: add request clone interface (v2)

On 06/16/2009 06:02 AM, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> Hi Boaz, Jeff, Jens,
>>> Perhaps
>>> blk_rq_{clone,declone} or blk_rq_{clone,declone}_bios
>>>
>>> (Both unclone and declone are found on the net but are not
>>>  found in the free dictionary)
> 
> I had a feeling that blk_rq_{clone,declone} allocates/frees
> the clone request inside the interfaces like bio_clone(), so
> I didn't take such namings.
> And, the clone setup interface may not only make bio clones
> but also do something else (for other request members), so
> I didn't add any 'bio' namings to the interfaces.
> 

I'm convinced blk_rq_prep_clone is good for what it actually does

> Jens, what do you prefer?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kiyoshi Ueda

Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/