linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default percpu allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:15:18 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, kyle@...artin.ca,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, Jesper.Nilsson@...s.com,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
	Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default
 percpu allocator

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 12:40 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> The following architectures are affected by this change.
>>
>> * sh
>> * arm
>> * cris
>> * mips
>> * sparc(32)
>> * blackfin
>> * avr32
>> * parisc (broken, under investigation)
> 
> I haven't seen anything of this on the parisc list ... what's the
> problem?  and do you need systems or any other help to fix it?

I really don't know what's wrong as nothing should be different from
the old percpu allocator as seen from the arch code.

Kyle reported that the system didn't boot with the patch applied.
Access to a system would be nice but boot debugging usually is done
much easier with local access, so I was hoping he would follow up.
Kyle, do you have any details?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/