linux-kernel - [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Hide runqueues from direct refer at source code level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:33:33 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Hide runqueues from direct refer at source code level

Commit-ID:  348ec61e6268c3cd7ee75cfa50e408184a941506
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/348ec61e6268c3cd7ee75cfa50e408184a941506
Author:     Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:20:55 +0900
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:29:42 +0200

sched: Hide runqueues from direct refer at source code level

There are some points which refer the per-cpu value "runqueues" directly.
sched.c provides nice abstraction, such as cpu_rq() and this_rq(),
so we should use these macros when looking runqueues.

Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
LKML-Reference: <20090617.222055.374768827975756908.mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 kernel/sched_debug.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 467ca72..70c7e0b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	s64 MIN_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, max_vruntime = -1,
 		spread, rq0_min_vruntime, spread0;
-	struct rq *rq = &per_cpu(runqueues, cpu);
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	struct sched_entity *last;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	if (last)
 		max_vruntime = last->vruntime;
 	min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
-	rq0_min_vruntime = per_cpu(runqueues, 0).cfs.min_vruntime;
+	rq0_min_vruntime = cpu_rq(0)->cfs.min_vruntime;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
 	SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "MIN_vruntime",
 			SPLIT_NS(MIN_vruntime));
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
 
 static void print_cpu(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
 {
-	struct rq *rq = &per_cpu(runqueues, cpu);
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 	{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/