linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] AFS: Implement OpenAFS pioctls(version)s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] AFS: Implement OpenAFS pioctls(version)s

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:

> There are no magic "automounts" such that OS won't know that
> user.tytso AFS Volume in the athena.mit.edu AFS cell is at
> /afs/athena.mit.edu/user/t/y/tytso, so the only "mountpoint" that
> exists as far as AFS is concerned is at /afs --- and that in the AFS
> world, it's essentially a universal convention that AFS pathnames
> begin with "/afs", and so the AFS filesystem will always be mounted in /afs.

so does this mean that there can never be more than a single AFS 
filesystem mounted?

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/