| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:12:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@...com> cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Recurse when searching for empty slots in resources trees On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Andrew Patterson wrote: > > > > This is why I'd really like to see the output of my test-patch. It would > > show exactly _where_ that resource is inserted, and the whole call-chain. > > > > I'm appending a version that only does it for resources that have names > > starting with "PCI Bus", so it should be less noisy. But again, it's > > totally untested. > > > > Here you go (I can provide the full boot log if needed). Note, there is > nothing for c3 here: Ok, so that means it got inserted into the resource tree some other way entirely. Or maybe the name got changed after-the-fact. Both of which imply that something is really really wrong. The ones your trace _does_ show are the ones that got inserted correctly and aren't buggy. Can anybody see how that buggy resource got inserted? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists