linux-kernel - Re: [KVM PATCH 3/4] eventfd: add generalized notifier interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:46:27 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
CC:	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, mst@...hat.com, avi@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH 3/4] eventfd: add generalized notifier interface

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>   
>> We currently open-code notification registration via the f_ops->poll()
>> method of the eventfd.  Lets abstract this into a notification API
>> extension of eventfd, while still using the wait-queue as the underlying
>> mechanism.  This will allow us to manage the notification mechanism
>> internal to eventfd without requiring the clients to change.  This also
>> gives us the opportunity to implement race-free release() callbacks,
>> which we do later in the series.
>>     
>
> Another attempt to push KVM stuff into eventfd.

??  I do not believe there is a single iota of KVM specific code in that
patch.  Can you elaborate?

-Greg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (267 bytes)