linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] v2 Re: Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash on new years 2008-2009

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:48:51 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Adams <cmadams@...aay.net>,
	510478@...s.debian.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v2 Re: Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash
 on new years 2008-2009

Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 16:34 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:

> Having investigated further, I believe it has been safe since this
> change made in 2.6.27 (which cleverly preempted the new year):
> 
> commit b845b517b5e3706a3729f6ea83b88ab85f0725b0
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date:   Fri Aug 8 21:47:09 2008 +0200
> 
>     printk: robustify printk
>     
>     Avoid deadlocks against rq->lock and xtime_lock by deferring the klogd
>     wakeup by polling from the timer tick.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> 
>> In addition, is it allowed for older kernels also or is Chris Adams'
>> patch something that should get picked up for the 2.6.27 stable series?
> 
> Anything older than 2.6.27 appears to need a change along the lines of
> the above-mentioned commit or Chris's patch.  Note that this was not the
> only case where printk() could be called under xtime_lock.  For example,
> in arch/alpha/kernel/time.c timer_interrupt() calls set_rtc_mmss() which
> can call printk().


It appears that the patch in question went into mainline in 2.6.28-rc1
after being developed on the -tip tree.  So it doesn't appear to be
present in the mainline 2.6.27 kernel.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/