| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:28:28 +0200 From: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com> To: Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdhci: Specific quirk vor VIA SDHCI controller in VX855ES Hi! On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:33:14PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Does this block have a name? Something nicer than 0x95d0 in the id list > would be nice. Unfortunately no. We really have a big mess with those integrated chipsets that have something like 15 PCI devices inside one component. We cannot call all of them 'VX855'. or 'VX800', as that would clash. Naming things 'PCI_DEVICE_VIA_VX800_SDHCI' is also not really correct, since the same block appearas in other integrated chipsets, too. As for VIA's documentation, every block is called something like D13F3 (pci device 13 function 3), which doesn't really sound all that much better than just putting a 0x95d0 there. To make things even furter complicated, some VIA Docs refer to the SDHCI controller as 'SDIO controller' and the via-sdmmc as 'SD card controller'... -- - Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com> http://linux.via.com.tw/ ============================================================================ VIA Free and Open Source Software Liaison -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists