linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/21] ceph: Ceph distributed file system client v0.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:19:55 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] ceph: Ceph distributed file system client v0.9

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:12:51PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:31:21PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > > This is a patch series for v0.9 of the Ceph distributed file system
> > > client (against v2.6.30).
> > 
> > Oh, one other question, why put this in staging?  What is keeping it
> > being accepted into fs/ like normal?
> 
> I would obviously prefer that route, but my assumption has been that the 
> code needs some review and a core developer to sign off on it before that 
> can happen.  I've posted the patchset a few times now, and haven't gotten 
> much response.  If there is something else I can or should be doing to 
> push this upstream, I'm all ears...

Have you posted it on the linux filesystems list?  I haven't noticed it
there, but I might have missed it.

> The code certainly isn't ready for production, but the client code at 
> least has seen relatively few changes recently.  Our internal testing is 
> ramping up in scale and so far we're primarily working out problems with 
> the server side daemons.  
> 
> I'm not quite sure what the criteria for mainline inclusion is, as it 
> seems to vary from file system to file system, but from my perspective 
> any move upstream can only help.

Review from the above mentioned list should be all that is needed.

If after that, you still want it in drivers/staging/, please feel free
to send it to me.

good luck,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/