linux-kernel - Re: Badness on the Warp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:03:03 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
CC:	Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@...atech.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Badness on the Warp

Frans Pop wrote:
> 
> The fact that your bisect ended at a merge essentially means that it is 
> invalid. As a merge does not introduce any actual change (unless it 
> includes changes to resolve conflicts), it normally cannot be the cause 
> of a regression.
> 

Sort of.  You can have a "bum merge" where code conflicts logically,
even if it isn't visible as a conflict in git.  Furthermore, of course,
you can have misresolved actual conflicts.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/