linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:06 +0900
From:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Jay Lan <jay.zen.lan@...il.com>
CC:	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT

Jay Lan wrote:
> Kdump with INIT on IPF worked on SGI's IA64 servers when i left SGI last
> December.
> Is this problem something new to you after .27?

No.
This is a potential bug in design, in case of INIT+INIT and panic+INIT. 

> SGI folks should test this patchset to ensure no surprise is introduced
> to their servers.

Any tests and comments would be appreciated.


Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/