linux-kernel - Re: BUG: Bad page state [was: Strange oopses in 2.6.30]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:42:09 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: Bad page state [was: Strange oopses in 2.6.30]

On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 11:39 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (cc to Mel and some reviewer)
> 
> > Flags are:
> > 0000000000400000 -- __PG_MLOCKED
> > 800000000050000c -- my page flags
> >         3650000c -- Maxim's page flags
> > 0000000000693ce1 -- my PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE
> 
> I guess commit da456f14d (page allocator: do not disable interrupts in
> free_page_mlock()) is a bit wrong.
> 
> current code is:
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> static void free_hot_cold_page(struct page *page, int cold)
> {
> (snip)
>         int clearMlocked = PageMlocked(page);
> (snip)
>         if (free_pages_check(page))
>                 return;
> (snip)
>         local_irq_save(flags);
>         if (unlikely(clearMlocked))
>                 free_page_mlock(page);
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Oh well, we remove PG_Mlocked *after* free_pages_check().
> Then, it makes false-positive warning.
> 
> Sorry, my review was also wrong. I think reverting this patch is better ;)

Well, I am not sure we need to revert the patch. I'd argue it's simply a
bug in free_pages_check() that can be fixed with something like this.
Mel, what do you think?

			Pekka

diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
index d6792f8..b002b65 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static inline void __ClearPageTail(struct page *page)
  * these flags set.  It they are, there is a problem.
  */
 #define PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE \
-	(1 << PG_lru	 | 1 << PG_locked    | \
+	(1 << PG_lru	 | \
 	 1 << PG_private | 1 << PG_private_2 | \
 	 1 << PG_buddy	 | 1 << PG_writeback | 1 << PG_reserved | \
 	 1 << PG_slab	 | 1 << PG_swapcache | 1 << PG_active | \
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index a5f3c27..ff7c713 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -497,6 +497,11 @@ static void free_page_mlock(struct page *page) { }
 
 static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Note: the page can have PG_mlock set here because we clear it
+	 * lazily to avoid unnecessary disabling and enabling of interrupts in
+	 * page free fastpath.
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) |
 		(page->mapping != NULL)  |
 		(atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0) |


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/