linux-kernel - Re: cmd64x: irq 14: nobody cared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	elendil@...net.nl
Cc:	bzolnier@...il.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cmd64x: irq 14: nobody cared - system is dreadfully slow

From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:04:15 +0200

> On Monday 22 June 2009, you wrote:
>> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] ide: fix handling of unexpected IRQs vs request_irq()
>>
>> Add ide_host_enable_irqs() helper and use it in ide_host_register()
>> before registering ports.  Then remove no longer needed IRQ unmasking
>> from in init_irq().
>>
>> This should fix the problem with "screaming" shared IRQ on the first
>> port (after request_irq() call while we have the unexpected IRQ pending
>> on the second port) which was uncovered by my rework of the serialized
>> interfaces support.
> 
> Thanks Bart. This does solve the "nobody cared" problem.
> Tested-by: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>

I've applied this patch to my tree, thanks everyone!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/