| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:17:52 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: merging the per-bdi writeback patchset On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:12:10PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Last time we discussed this you said you're happy with 2.6.32. I really > > want to take a more detailed look and put that on the not so urgent list > > because ou didn't seem to rush for .31. So my vote goes for waiting a > > bit longer. > > Yeah, 2.6.32 works for me too, .31 would have been nice though so I > don't have to carry it around anymore. But either is fine, if you and > Andrew want more time to review this stuff, then lets just settle for > .32. Yes, I'd really prefer more time. I also expect to come up with some more changes in that area. Your patch makes the differences between kupdate and pdflush-stye writeback look even more ugly then it already is, so I want to see i there's some nicer way to handle it. I also want to take a look if it makes sense to distangle data integrity and background writeback somehow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists