linux-kernel - Re: [patch] eventfd - revised interface and cleanups (2nd rev)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:12:39 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	ghaskins@...ell.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, bcrl@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch] eventfd - revised interface and cleanups (2nd rev)

On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:

> Another cleanup this patch does, is making AIO select EVENTFD, instead of 
> adding a bunch of empty function stubs inside eventfd.h in order to 
> handle the (AIO && !EVENTFD) case.

Given that we're trying to squeak this patch into 2.6.31, it's quite
unfortunate to include unrelated changes.  Especially ones which
involve the always-problematic "select".  Although this one looks less
than usually deadly due to the simple dependencies of AIO and eventfd.

However...

Is this a good way of fixing the (AIO && !EVENTFD) case?  Surely if the
developer selected this combination, he doesn't want to carry the
overhead of including eventfd.  IOW, if AIO can work acceptably without
eventfd being compiled into the kernel then adding the stubs is a
superior solution.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/