| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:35:56 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 6/6] ide: improve handling of Power Management requests
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ide: improve handling of Power Management requests
Make hwif->rq point to PM request during PM sequence and do not allow
any other types of requests to slip in (the old comment was never correct
as there should be no such requests generated during PM sequence).
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
---
This was tested in the past (with an additional testing from Borislav)
however there were block layer changes in the meantime so you may want
to give it some more testing time just to be sure.
drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -466,10 +466,14 @@ void do_ide_request(struct request_queue
if (!ide_lock_port(hwif)) {
ide_hwif_t *prev_port;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
repeat:
prev_port = hwif->host->cur_port;
+
+ if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED)
+ rq = hwif->rq;
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
+
if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_SLEEPING &&
time_after(drive->sleep, jiffies)) {
ide_unlock_port(hwif);
@@ -496,43 +500,29 @@ repeat:
hwif->cur_dev = drive;
drive->dev_flags &= ~(IDE_DFLAG_SLEEPING | IDE_DFLAG_PARKED);
- spin_unlock_irq(&hwif->lock);
- spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- /*
- * we know that the queue isn't empty, but this can happen
- * if the q->prep_rq_fn() decides to kill a request
- */
- if (!rq)
+ if (rq == NULL) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&hwif->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ /*
+ * we know that the queue isn't empty, but this can
+ * happen if ->prep_rq_fn() decides to kill a request
+ */
rq = blk_fetch_request(drive->queue);
+ spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
-
- if (!rq) {
- ide_unlock_port(hwif);
- goto out;
+ if (rq == NULL) {
+ ide_unlock_port(hwif);
+ goto out;
+ }
}
/*
* Sanity: don't accept a request that isn't a PM request
- * if we are currently power managed. This is very important as
- * blk_stop_queue() doesn't prevent the blk_fetch_request()
- * above to return us whatever is in the queue. Since we call
- * ide_do_request() ourselves, we end up taking requests while
- * the queue is blocked...
- *
- * We let requests forced at head of queue with ide-preempt
- * though. I hope that doesn't happen too much, hopefully not
- * unless the subdriver triggers such a thing in its own PM
- * state machine.
+ * if we are currently power managed.
*/
- if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) &&
- blk_pm_request(rq) == 0 &&
- (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_PREEMPT) == 0) {
- /* there should be no pending command at this point */
- ide_unlock_port(hwif);
- goto plug_device;
- }
+ BUG_ON((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) &&
+ blk_pm_request(rq) == 0);
hwif->rq = rq;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists