linux-kernel - Re: [merged] proctxt-update-kernel-filesystem-proctxt-documentation.patch removed from -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:57:48 +0200
From:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [merged]
 proctxt-update-kernel-filesystem-proctxt-documentation.patch removed from
 -mm tree

Am Mittwoch, den 24.06.2009, 08:30 -0700 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:33:25 +0200 Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net> wrote:
> 
> > > > Alexey's point is that follow_page() will return NULL if it hits a
> > > > swapped-out stack page and the loop will exit, leading to an incorrect
> > > > (ie: short) return value from get_stack_usage_in_bytes().
> > > >
> > > > Is this claim wrong?
> > > 
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > I digged in the kernel source and the only solution i found is to use
> > the walk_page_range() like show_smap() in proc/fs/task_mmu.c.
> > 
> > Maybe there is an easier way, but i dont know.
> > 
> > So i would implement a similar function like smaps_pte_range() in
> > proc/fs/task_mmu.c to detected the high water usage.
> 
> Perhaps we could enhance follow_page() so that it can tell the caller
> when the target page is "virtually there", but swapped out.  Add a new
> FOLL_SWAP, I guess.
> 

I currently fixed it by using walk_page_range(). I think this is a quiet
good solution. But if you like i can do it in a future version.

> How to communicate this back to the caller?  Perhaps add another
> argument to follow_page(), perhaps return some magic value such as
> 
> #define FOLLOW_PAGE_SWAPPED_PAGE ((struct page *)1)
> 
> Adding the additional argument would be nicer.

IMHO i think it would be the best to add a new FOLL_NOTIFY_SWAP flag and
if the page is swapped out return the FOLLOW_PAGE_SWAPPED_PAGE magic if
this flag is passed.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/