linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Hugepages should be accounted as unevictable pages.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:08:34 -0700
From:	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hugepages should be accounted as unevictable pages.


On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 16:41 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:23 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > > Could you just teach the thing to which you are hinting that it also
> > > needs to go look in sysfs for huge page counts?
> > 
> > :) yeah i could do that too...the point is that its a module and the
> > function to get the hugepages count is not exported right now. I could
> > very well add this as an exported symbol and use it from there, but
> > there can be someone who doesn't want symbols to be unnecessarily
> > exported if their is no in-tree modular usage of that symbol. 
> 
> Hmmm.  So what is the module doing?  The ol', "try to get as much memory
> as I possibly can" game? :)
> 
> It sounds like you can get access to the vm statistics from existing
> exported symbols, but the stats don't give you quite the info that you
> need.

>   So, you're trying to change things that you *can* get access to.

:) Not entirely, I thought that UNEVICTABLE by definition should
consider hugepages too. 

> 
> We do export all this stuff to userspace.  We export all of the huge
> page sizes and how many pages are reserved, used, and allocated in each,
> plus the contentious Unevictable.  Could you just do this calculation in
> userspace and pass it into the module with a modparam or sysfs file?

Hmm...lets see, I will look to moving that to userspace or something. 

But irrespective of my need, we must clear the confusion around what
unevictable should actually mean. 

I am biased towards getting hugepages accounted in that :), but what do
others think ? 

Lee, I will let you take a decision on that, if the current semantics
look okay, it would be great if you could update the unevictable_lru
documentation about this being just the number of pages on
unevictable_lru.

Thanks,
Alok
> 
> -- Dave
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/