| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:03:15 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: NMI watchdog + NOHZ question > I'm not exactly sure what to do about this. Ack the timer interrupt earlier (and also give it a high priority?) That could be still problematic if you have non nestabled irq stacks (haven't checked if sparc has that or not), potentially you might need to run the softirq on the process stack. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists