linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2009-06-30-12-50 uploaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:21:05 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-06-30-12-50 uploaded

On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:47:26 PDT, Andrew Morton said:

> apart from having a crappy title, linux-next's
> 
> : commit f29876421ec11f7d66f3d982219ef3af9bcccf32
> : Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> : AuthorDate: Wed Jul 1 12:37:19 2009 +1000
> : Commit: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> : CommitDate: Wed Jul 1 12:37:19 2009 +1000
> :
> : misc:work_on_cpu-acpi
> :
> 
> causes get_throttling() to newly be called from an IPI, and lockdep doesn't
> like irq-disabled interrupt handlers doing local_irq_enable().
> 
> 
> If we rely upon these functions only ever being called from
> smp_call_function_single(), and if smp_call_function_single() is
> correctly implemented, we should be able to do this:

I'll take a leap of faith on the "correctly implemented" part.  However,
I admit I'm probably going to wait till Len or somebody agrees on the
"only calledf from function_single()" part being correct before test-driving
the patch...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped