lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:14:21 -0700 From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: alex.shi@...el.com, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13690] New: nodes_clear cause hugepage unusable on non-NUMA machine that looks strange... config is 32bit. the second patch only do save and restore. and should be right right. please check following patch on today's linus tree. and send out /proc/iomem Thanks Yinghai [PATCH] x86: add boundary check for 32bit res before expand e820 resource to alignment fix hang with HIGHMEM_64G and 32bit resource. according to hpa and Linus, use (resource_size_t)-1 to fend off big ranges. analyized by hpa Reported-and-tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h | 3 --- arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- include/linux/kernel.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c @@ -1367,9 +1367,9 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources(void) } /* How much should we pad RAM ending depending on where it is? */ -static unsigned long ram_alignment(resource_size_t pos) +static u64 ram_alignment(u64 pos) { - unsigned long mb = pos >> 20; + u64 mb = pos >> 20; /* To 64kB in the first megabyte */ if (!mb) @@ -1383,6 +1383,8 @@ static unsigned long ram_alignment(resou return 32*1024*1024; } +#define MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE ((resource_size_t)-1) + void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(void) { int i; @@ -1400,17 +1402,19 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources_late( * avoid stolen RAM: */ for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) { - struct e820entry *entry = &e820_saved.map[i]; - resource_size_t start, end; + struct e820entry *entry = &e820.map[i]; + u64 start, end; if (entry->type != E820_RAM) continue; start = entry->addr + entry->size; - end = round_up(start, ram_alignment(start)); - if (start == end) + end = round_up(start, ram_alignment(start)) - 1; + if (end > MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE) + end = MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE; + if (start > end) continue; - reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, - end - 1, "RAM buffer"); + reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, end, + "RAM buffer"); } } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists