| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:00:19 +0800 From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com> To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> CC: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Fix indent for /proc/cgroups Li Zefan wrote: > Gui Jianfeng wrote: >> Li Zefan wrote: >>> CC: container list >>> >>> Gui Jianfeng wrote: >>>> Currently, /proc/cgroups outputs is fairly ugly as following, >>>> #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled >>>> cpuset 0 1 1 >>>> debug 0 1 1 >>>> ns 0 1 1 >>>> >>>> indent it in a good-looking way. >>>> #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled >>>> cpuset 0 1 1 >>>> debug 0 1 1 >>>> ns 0 1 1 >>>> >>> But if there's a subsystem with name length >= 8, >>> it won't be aligned properly.. >> Yeap, but there isn't such a case at least by now. >> > > This is not a good reason. > > We'll probably have such a subsystem. Actually there's a > proposed subsystem named "maxdepth" which is of length 8. > > See: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/1/581 yes, this is a case. But at least others can be aligned properly, right? Anyway, please ignore it if you don't like this change. > > > > -- Regards Gui Jianfeng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists