linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] perf tools: gitignore *.data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:36:36 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf tools: gitignore *.data

Em Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > perf.data made by perf record is a data file and need to be 
> > > > ignored by git
> > > > 
> > > > Added *.data so that perf.data and its friends will be ignored.
> > > 
> > > >  cscope*
> > > > +*.data
> > > 
> > > ok, this is something i wanted to revisit eventually - the 
> > > 'perf.data' name sucks a bit - as .data postfix is quite unspecific.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps trace.perf is a better default name, and all files would 
> > > have the .perf postfix?
> > > 
> > > I've Cc:-ed a number of folks who might have an opinion about this - 
> > > what would be the best default naming and postfix for perf binary 
> > > files?
> > > 
> > > 	Ingo
> > 
> > perf.bin seems to me adequate as it tells everything (IMHO).
> 
> hm, .bin is pretty overloaded as well. It also suggests a 
> 'executable binary' in a certain way - which it isnt.

.samples
.perf
.perf_samples
.ps - oops, also used ;-)

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/