linux-kernel - Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 6/6] tpm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:33:40 -0700
From:	Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
To:	Marcin Obara <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	Andy Isaacson <adi@...are.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, seiji.munetoh@...il.com,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Shahbaz Khan <shaz.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 6/6] tpm_tis: add workarounds for iTPM

On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:18:18PM +0200, Marcin Obara wrote:
> 2009/7/1 Andy Isaacson <adi@...are.com>:
> > Some Lenovo platforms (X200 and T400, maybe others) have an "iTPM" which
> > does not quite conform to the TPM spec. ?With one small hack the iTPM
> > seems to work OK.
> 
> Small comment:
> 
> Intel iTPM on mobile platforms require this patch.
> Intel iTPM on desktop platforms works well without this patch.

Please do expand on this -- I don't have access to any iTPM desktop
platforms to verify.  Can you provide information on what desktop
platforms behave differently so that I can adjust the patch?

If you could simply boot a kernel with my patch series on a desktop iTPM
and provide the dmesg output, that would be great!

Thanks,
-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/