linux-kernel - Re: Xeon 5500 series support in kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:41:15 +0100
From:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	xb <xavier.bru@...l.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Xeon 5500 series support in kernel

On 2 Jul 2009, Andi Kleen outgrape:

> xb <xavier.bru@...l.net> writes:
>
>> I wonder if there are specific kernel configuration parameters that
>> allow to optimize performances on the recent Xeon 5500 processors (aka
>> Nehalem).
>
> The most important optimization is to use a 64bit kernel with NUMA
> support enabled (even if you use 32bit userland)

Surely NUMA only benefits you if you have a >1 socket system? Where's
the nonuniform access on a 1-socket machine? Every core is as far from
all the RAM as every other core, isn't it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/