lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 07:39:20 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] perf tools: callchains: Manage the cumul hits on the fly The cumul hits are the number of hits of every childs of a node plus the hits of the current nodes, required for percentage computing of a branch. Theses numbers are calculated during the sorting of the branches of the callchain tree using a depth first postfix traversal, so that cumulative hits are propagated in the right order. But if we plan to implement percentages relative to the parent and not absolute percentages (relative to the whole overhead), we need to know the cumulative hits of the parent before computing the children because the relative minimum acceptable number of entries (ie: minimum rate against the cumulative hits from the parent) is the basis to filter the children against a given rate. Then we need to handle the cumul hits on the fly to prepare the implementation of relative overhead rates. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> --- tools/perf/util/callchain.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c index c9900fe..5d244af 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c @@ -74,13 +74,11 @@ static void __sort_chain_graph(struct callchain_node *node, u64 min_hit) struct callchain_node *child; node->rb_root = RB_ROOT; - node->cumul_hit = node->hit; chain_for_each_child(child, node) { __sort_chain_graph(child, min_hit); if (child->cumul_hit >= min_hit) rb_insert_callchain(&node->rb_root, child, GRAPH); - node->cumul_hit += child->cumul_hit; } } @@ -159,7 +157,7 @@ add_child(struct callchain_node *parent, struct ip_callchain *chain, new = create_child(parent, false); fill_node(new, chain, start, syms); - new->hit = 1; + new->cumul_hit = new->hit = 1; } /* @@ -189,6 +187,7 @@ split_add_child(struct callchain_node *parent, struct ip_callchain *chain, /* split the hits */ new->hit = parent->hit; + new->cumul_hit = parent->cumul_hit; new->val_nr = parent->val_nr - idx_local; parent->val_nr = idx_local; @@ -216,10 +215,13 @@ __append_chain_children(struct callchain_node *root, struct ip_callchain *chain, unsigned int ret = __append_chain(rnode, chain, start, syms); if (!ret) - return; + goto cumul; } /* nothing in children, add to the current node */ add_child(root, chain, start, syms); + +cumul: + root->cumul_hit++; } static int @@ -261,6 +263,8 @@ __append_chain(struct callchain_node *root, struct ip_callchain *chain, /* we match 100% of the path, increment the hit */ if (i - start == root->val_nr && i == chain->nr) { root->hit++; + root->cumul_hit++; + return 0; } -- 1.6.2.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists