lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:34:00 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf report: Support callchains with relative
	overhead rate


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:

> The current callchain displays the overhead rates as absolute:
> relative to the total overhead.
> 
> This patch provides relative overhead percentage, in which each
> branch of the callchain tree is a independant instrumentated object.
> 
> You can produce such output by using the "relative" mode
> that you can lower in r, re, rel, etc...
> 
> ./perf report -s sym -c relative
> 
> Example:
> 
>      8.46%  [k] copy_user_generic_string
>                 |
>                 |--52.01%-- generic_file_aio_read
>                 |          do_sync_read
>                 |          vfs_read
>                 |          |
>                 |          |--97.20%-- sys_pread64
>                 |          |          system_call_fastpath
>                 |          |          pread64
>                 |          |
>                 |           --2.81%-- sys_read
>                 |                     system_call_fastpath
>                 |                     __read
>                 |
>                 |--39.85%-- generic_file_buffered_write
>                 |          __generic_file_aio_write_nolock
>                 |          generic_file_aio_write
>                 |          do_sync_write
>                 |          reiserfs_file_write
>                 |          vfs_write
>                 |          |
>                 |          |--97.05%-- sys_pwrite64
>                 |          |          system_call_fastpath
>                 |          |          __pwrite64
>                 |          |
>                 |           --2.95%-- sys_write
>                 |                     system_call_fastpath
>                 |                     __write_nocancel
> [...]

Wow, this is extremely intuitive and powerful looking!

It's basically a fractal structure: each sub-graph looks like a 
full-blown profile in itself. Thus the overhead of individual 
components of the graph profile can be analyzed without having to 
think in small numbers.

The above example shows it particularly well - it shows that in 
regard to generic_file_buffered_write() overhead, the system is 
doing 97% sys_pwrite64() calls and 3% sys_write() calls.

Thus i took the liberty to change your last patch in two ways: i 
renamed 'relative' to 'fractal' (it was not a proper counterpart to 
'graph' anyway - we have no 'absolute' output mode name either), and 
i changed it to be the default output mode. This stuff rocks!

absolute-graph and flat mode can be displayed too, via the option, 
as usual.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ