lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:26:09 +0200
From:	Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Larry.Finger@...inger.net, chunkeey@....de,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54: Fix regression in 2.6.31-rcX since commit a1091aa - 
	sleeping function called from invalid context

2009/7/6 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
> From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:43:45 -0500
>
>> I'm available for testing.
>
> I just committed the following to my net-2.6 tree, give
> it a spin:
>
> From 0ca1b08eba627b4245efd0f71b55a062bf163777 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:49:18 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "p54: Use SKB list handling helpers instead of by-hand code."
>
> This reverts commit a1091aae19b1d9c85d91c86915a611387f67a26b.
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c
> index b618bd1..48d81d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c
> @@ -823,30 +823,30 @@ void p54_free_skb(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>        struct p54_tx_info *range;
>        unsigned long flags;
>
> -       if (unlikely(!skb || !dev || skb_queue_empty(&priv->tx_queue)))
> +       if (unlikely(!skb || !dev || !skb_queue_len(&priv->tx_queue)))
>                return;
>
> -       /* There used to be a check here to see if the SKB was on the
> -        * TX queue or not.  This can never happen because all SKBs we
> -        * see here successfully went through p54_assign_address()
> -        * which means the SKB is on the ->tx_queue.
> +       /*
> +        * don't try to free an already unlinked skb
>         */
> +       if (unlikely((!skb->next) || (!skb->prev)))
> +               return;
>
>        spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
>        info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
>        range = (void *)info->rate_driver_data;
> -       if (!skb_queue_is_first(&priv->tx_queue, skb)) {
> +       if (skb->prev != (struct sk_buff *)&priv->tx_queue) {
>                struct ieee80211_tx_info *ni;
>                struct p54_tx_info *mr;
>
> -               ni = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb_queue_prev(&priv->tx_queue, skb));
> +               ni = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb->prev);
>                mr = (struct p54_tx_info *)ni->rate_driver_data;
>        }
> -       if (!skb_queue_is_last(&priv->tx_queue, skb)) {
> +       if (skb->next != (struct sk_buff *)&priv->tx_queue) {
>                struct ieee80211_tx_info *ni;
>                struct p54_tx_info *mr;
>
> -               ni = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb_queue_next(&priv->tx_queue, skb));
> +               ni = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb->next);
>                mr = (struct p54_tx_info *)ni->rate_driver_data;
>        }
>        __skb_unlink(skb, &priv->tx_queue);
> @@ -864,13 +864,15 @@ static struct sk_buff *p54_find_tx_entry(struct ieee80211_hw *dev,
>        unsigned long flags;
>
>        spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
> -       skb_queue_walk(&priv->tx_queue, entry) {
> +       entry = priv->tx_queue.next;
> +       while (entry != (struct sk_buff *)&priv->tx_queue) {
>                struct p54_hdr *hdr = (struct p54_hdr *) entry->data;
>
>                if (hdr->req_id == req_id) {
>                        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
>                        return entry;
>                }
> +               entry = entry->next;
>        }
>        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
>        return NULL;
> @@ -888,22 +890,24 @@ static void p54_rx_frame_sent(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>        int count, idx;
>
>        spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
> -       skb_queue_walk(&priv->tx_queue, entry) {
> +       entry = (struct sk_buff *) priv->tx_queue.next;
> +       while (entry != (struct sk_buff *)&priv->tx_queue) {
>                struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(entry);
>                struct p54_hdr *entry_hdr;
>                struct p54_tx_data *entry_data;
>                unsigned int pad = 0, frame_len;
>
>                range = (void *)info->rate_driver_data;
> -               if (range->start_addr != addr)
> +               if (range->start_addr != addr) {
> +                       entry = entry->next;
>                        continue;
> +               }
>
> -               if (!skb_queue_is_last(&priv->tx_queue, entry)) {
> +               if (entry->next != (struct sk_buff *)&priv->tx_queue) {
>                        struct ieee80211_tx_info *ni;
>                        struct p54_tx_info *mr;
>
> -                       ni = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb_queue_next(&priv->tx_queue,
> -                                                            entry));
> +                       ni = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(entry->next);
>                        mr = (struct p54_tx_info *)ni->rate_driver_data;
>                }
>
> @@ -1164,21 +1168,23 @@ static int p54_assign_address(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
>                }
>        }
>
> -       skb_queue_walk(&priv->tx_queue, entry) {
> +       entry = priv->tx_queue.next;
> +       while (left--) {
>                u32 hole_size;
>                info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(entry);
>                range = (void *)info->rate_driver_data;
>                hole_size = range->start_addr - last_addr;
>                if (!target_skb && hole_size >= len) {
> -                       target_skb = skb_queue_prev(&priv->tx_queue, entry);
> +                       target_skb = entry->prev;
>                        hole_size -= len;
>                        target_addr = last_addr;
>                }
>                largest_hole = max(largest_hole, hole_size);
>                last_addr = range->end_addr;
> +               entry = entry->next;
>        }
>        if (!target_skb && priv->rx_end - last_addr >= len) {
> -               target_skb = skb_peek_tail(&priv->tx_queue);
> +               target_skb = priv->tx_queue.prev;
>                largest_hole = max(largest_hole, priv->rx_end - last_addr - len);
>                if (!skb_queue_empty(&priv->tx_queue)) {
>                        info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(target_skb);
> @@ -2084,6 +2090,7 @@ out:
>  static void p54_stop(struct ieee80211_hw *dev)
>  {
>        struct p54_common *priv = dev->priv;
> +       struct sk_buff *skb;
>
>        mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex);
>        priv->mode = NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED;
> @@ -2098,7 +2105,8 @@ static void p54_stop(struct ieee80211_hw *dev)
>                p54_tx_cancel(dev, priv->cached_beacon);
>
>        priv->stop(dev);
> -       skb_queue_purge(&priv->tx_queue);
> +       while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&priv->tx_queue)))
> +               kfree_skb(skb);
>        priv->cached_beacon = NULL;
>        priv->tsf_high32 = priv->tsf_low32 = 0;
>        mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

I can confirm that the patch fixes the problem with my PCMCIA card :-)

Best regards,
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ