linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip V2] x86: thread_info.h moving comment to where it should be

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:44:13 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip V2] x86: thread_info.h moving comment to where it
 should be

Jaswinder,

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 20:54 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > 
> > > By mistake commit 2052e8d40ad58 moved following comment to wrong place,
> > > where it does not make any sense :
> > 
> > Wrong. commit 2052e8d4 had the comments in the right place. commit
> > 3351cc03 replaced the two identical INIT_THREAD_INFO macros and did
> > not update the comments.
> > 
> 
> Ahh so you was also part of it, here is updated patch:

if you expect that you earn more trust by such snotty comments, then
you are really on the wrong track. To keep the record straight:

 _You_ sent a patch with a bogus patch description.

Instead of silently sending a fixed up patch after I pointed out to
you that your commit log is incorrect you come back and make pompous
comments about who is doing wrong and who has taken part of it.

> [PATCH -tip] x86: thread_info.h moving comment to where it should be
> 
> By mistake commit 3351cc03 forget to move following comment along
> with INIT_THREAD_INFO :
> 
>  "preempt_count needs to be 1 initially, until the scheduler is functional."
> 
> Moving comment back to right place where preempt_count is setting to 1
> 
> Also by mistake commit 2052e8d4 forget to fix extra line which is not required.
> Removed that extra line.

That changelog is just another proof of your attempts to make a
moutain out of a molehill:

It does not matter at all which commit did not move a comment and it
does even matter less which commit did not remove or added a blank
line. For this patch a commit message consisting of a single subject
line:

  x86: thread_info.h: move comment and remove stray newline

is sufficient and more useful than your "by mistake ..."
fingerpointing.

We care about those details with _real_ code bugs, but not for the
sake of pointing at the person who made a mistake. We simply care
because we want a reference to the context where and why it happened.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/