linux-kernel - Re: cpufreq cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:51:15 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: cpufreq cleanups - .30 vs .31

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:

 > So if not find too intrusive, I'd say:
 > Venkatesh's whole series of:
 > [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
 > should be seen in .31.
 >  ...
 > The one patch from Mathieu:
 > [patch 2.6.30 2/4] CPUFREQ: fix (utter) cpufreq_add_dev mess
 > is a separate, general cleanup which should show up in .31.

I came to the same conclusion after reading the thread, and looking
over the patches.  I merged the above, and sent Linus a pull request
a few minutes ago.

Thanks Mathieu and Venki for chasing this down.

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/