[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:48:21 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] asm-generic:remove calling flush_write_buffers()
in dma_sync_*_for_cpu
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:54:20AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2009/6/30 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Well, not even that. dma-mapping-common.h only makes sense on architectures
> > that have multiple dma-mapping implementations (parisc, mips, arm, powerpc,
>
> It seems that there is only one dma-mmaping implementation on ARM, doesn't it?
> Is it necessary that using dma-mapping-common.h on ARM?
ARM has two (normal, and dma bounce), and in the long run we need to do
cache handling on unmap as well as map due to CPU speculative fetches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists