[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:27:49 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v9 2/2] KVM: add iosignalfd support
On 07/07/2009 03:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:53:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>>>> + /* address-range must be precise for a hit */
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So there's apparently no way to specify that
>>> you want 1,2, or 4 byte writes at address X?
>>>
>>>
>> Why would you want that?
>>
>
> Donnu. Why would anyone want to catch 8 byte writes at all?
>
One of the natural write sizes.
> Seriously, why add artificial limitations?
> IMO, addr=0,len=1 and addr=0,len=2 should not conflict.
>
>
They should not conflict, but a two byte write need not hit a one byte
registration.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists