lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:25:08 +0100
From:	Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Increase lockdep limits: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH

(Applies to current Linus tree, as of 2.6.31-rc2)

As a result of increasing MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES on the previous
patch, another limit surfaced as being hit too soon.
This patch increases MAX_LOCK_DEPTH, being hit by false positives, and
turning off the locking correctness validator.

The new value is arbitrary, but I believe the old one was too. Given
the amount of changes happening with regards to the usage of lockdep,
the previous limit is just too low and keeping it that way would
defeat the purpose of lockdep.


Signed-off-by: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com>

---
 include/linux/sched.h |    2 +-
 1 files changes, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 0085d75..304231b 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ struct task_struct {
        int softirq_context;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-# define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
+# define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 96UL
        u64 curr_chain_key;
        int lockdep_depth;
        unsigned int lockdep_recursion;
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ