lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:17:57 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	trivial <trivial@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] trivial: fix typo "that that" in multiple files


Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> The "that that" can read awkwardly even for native English (or, for that
> matter, American) speakers, even though it sounds quite natural in spoken
> English.

I think it sounds quite natural when you say it because you say them
differently - or at least I do.  The first 'that' is a conjunction, and the
second a determinative.  Possibly the determinative should be in italics, but
that's hard to do in plain text.

> Would it be possible to reword as for the RCU example?
> ...
> 	"likely that this process will submit another request soon, and that"

This is actually the as-iosched.txt example.

To use the RCU example:

	Therefore, as soon as a CPU is seen passing through any of these
	three states, we know that that CPU has exited any previous RCU
	read-side critical sections.

I think that in this example, "a CPU" should be paired with the "that"
determinative because you're not talking about the CPU you've got in your hand
per se, but a random CPU over there.

If you instead said "this CPU", being more specific, I think that's when you'd
use the "this" determinative:

	Therefore, as soon as this CPU is seen passing through any of these
	three states, we know that this CPU has exited any previous RCU
	read-side critical sections.

Of course, I'm not a qualified linguist - I know enough to make stuff up and
hopefully make it sound plausible.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ