lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:12:49 -0500
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, oleg@...hat.com,
	mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: optimize cond_resched()

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> plain text document attachment (sched_opt_cond_resched.patch)
> Optimize cond_resched() by removing one conditional.
> 
> Currently cond_resched() checks system_state ==
> SYSTEM_RUNNING in order to avoid scheduling before the
> scheduler is running.
> 
> We can however, as per suggestion of Matt, use
> PREEMPT_ACTIVE to accomplish that very same.

Pedantically, introducing should_resched should be its own patch, but
other than that, these two patches look good.

Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>

> Suggested-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h |    5 ++++-
>  kernel/sched.c        |   14 +++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -503,8 +503,11 @@ struct task_cputime {
>  /*
>   * Disable preemption until the scheduler is running.
>   * Reset by start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
> + *
> + * We include PREEMPT_ACTIVE to avoid cond_resched() from working
> + * before the scheduler is active -- see should_resched().
>   */
> -#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT	(1)
> +#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT	(1 + PREEMPT_ACTIVE)
>  
>  /**
>   * struct thread_group_cputimer - thread group interval timer counts
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -6580,6 +6580,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sched_yield)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int should_resched(void)
> +{
> +	return need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> +}
> +
>  static void __cond_resched(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
> @@ -6599,8 +6604,7 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
>  
>  int __sched _cond_resched(void)
>  {
> -	if (need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE) &&
> -					system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> +	if (should_resched()) {
>  		__cond_resched();
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> @@ -6618,12 +6622,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
>   */
>  int cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> -	int resched = need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
> +	int resched = should_resched();
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
>  		spin_unlock(lock);
> -		if (resched && need_resched())
> +		if (resched)
>  			__cond_resched();
>  		else
>  			cpu_relax();
> @@ -6638,7 +6642,7 @@ int __sched cond_resched_softirq(void)
>  {
>  	BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
>  
> -	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> +	if (should_resched()) {
>  		local_bh_enable();
>  		__cond_resched();
>  		local_bh_disable();
> 

-- 
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ