linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] i8042: support device async suspend & shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:40:15 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-acpi" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i8042: support device async suspend & shutdown

On Friday 17 July 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 08:37 +0800, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2009-07-15 15:38:42, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > 
> > > i8042 controller support device async actions.
> > > 
> > > If boot option "dev_async_action" is added,
> > > i8042 controller and its child devices can be
> > > suspended/resumed/shutdown asynchronously.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/input/serio/i8042.c |   10 +++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c
> > > @@ -1284,14 +1284,21 @@ static int __init i8042_init(void)
> > >  		goto err_unregister_driver;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	err = platform_device_add(i8042_platform_device);
> > > +	err = dev_async_register(&i8042_platform_device->dev,
> > > +			DEV_ASYNC_SUSPEND | DEV_ASYNC_SHUTDOWN);
> > >  	if (err)
> > >  		goto err_free_device;
> > >  
> > > +	err = platform_device_add(i8042_platform_device);
> > > +	if (err)
> > > +		goto err_dev_async_unregister;
> > > +
> > >  	panic_blink = i8042_panic_blink;
> > >  
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  
> > > + err_dev_async_unregister:
> > > +	dev_async_unregister(&i8042_platform_device->dev);
> > 
> > 
> > >   err_free_device:
> > >  	platform_device_put(i8042_platform_device);
> > >   err_unregister_driver:
> > > @@ -1304,6 +1311,7 @@ static int __init i8042_init(void)
> > >  
> > >  static void __exit i8042_exit(void)
> > >  {
> > > +	dev_async_unregister(&i8042_platform_device->dev);
> > >  	platform_device_unregister(i8042_platform_device);
> > >  	platform_driver_unregister(&i8042_driver);
> > >  	i8042_platform_exit();
> > 
> > Could we get the core to do async_unregister during device_unregister?
> > 
> yes, we can.
> I think it's a little strange that drivers need to invoke
> dev_async_register to register an async device group, but don't need to
> call dev_async_unregister to unregister it.
> 
> > Or maybe better, just add flags during device_add?
> > 
> Many devices don't know if they support async actions or not during
> device initialization time, like PCI and ACPI devices.
> If we want to create an async group for a PCI device, we have to call
> dev_async_register in the specified PCI device driver, rather than in
> the PCI bus scan stage.

That is quite a big design issue, IMO.

Did you consider any other approach to this?

Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/