linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sysrq, kdump: fix regression, revert "simplify sysrq-c handler"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:10:20 +0900
From:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Brayan Arraes <brayan@...k.com.br>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ken'ichi Ohmichi" <oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq, kdump: fix regression, revert "simplify sysrq-c
 handler"

Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:42:11AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> Can't we just set panic_on_oops = 1 in sysrq_handle_crash()? This will
>> make sure that we test oops path as well as have consistent behavior
>> between two methods of sysrc-c invocation.
>>
> Thats a good point too, seems simpler than the other approach.

OK, I'll take this way.  Please wait for a moment for a patch.

Thanks,
H.Seto

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/